Why don’t rovers on other planets or satellites in space ever take true video?
Probably because videos take a relatively large amount of storage space compared to photos, and they would take very long periods of time to transmit. Seeing as how there's no real added value to a video versus a picture when nothing is moving, there's not a great reason to do it other than "beca…
The Short Answer
Probably because videos take a relatively large amount of storage space compared to photos, and they would take very long periods of time to transmit. Seeing as how there's no real added value to a video versus a picture when nothing is moving, there's not a great reason to do it other than "because we can". "Because we can" isn't a sufficient argument when arguing for the millions of dollars in technology required to perform such a function.
Analysis
Key Concepts: Take, there's, probably
This explanation focuses on take, there's, probably and spans 78 words across 3 sentences. The depth is typical for Space & Astronomy questions (category average: 68 words), striking a balance between accessibility and completeness.
What This Answer Covers
The explanation opens with: “Probably because videos take a relatively large amount of storage space compared to photos, and they would take very lon” It then elaborates by explaining the root cause, ultimately building toward a complete picture across 3 connected points.
How This Compares in Space & Astronomy
Ranked #171 of 500 Space & Astronomy questions by answer depth (top 35%). This falls in the detailed tier — above average depth. The explanation goes beyond surface-level but keeps things accessible.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a simple explanation for why rovers on other planets or satellites in space ever take true video?
Probably because videos take a relatively large amount of storage space compared to photos, and they would take very long periods of time to transmit. Seeing as how there's no real added value to a video versus a picture when nothing is moving,…
How detailed is this explanation compared to similar Space & Astronomy questions?
This is an above-average answer at 78 words, ranked #171 of 500 Space & Astronomy questions by depth. The key concepts covered are take, there's, probably.
What approach does this answer take to explain rovers on other planets or satellites in space ever take tru?
The explanation uses root cause analysis across 78 words. It is categorized under Space & Astronomy and addresses the question through 1 analytical lens.