Why doesn’t the US/EU/UN/NATO intervene in the Ukraine, like they did in Syria/Libya/Afghanistan/etc….
This was answered pretty well by /u/Arn_Thor in /r/Ask_Politics > Because riots in a sovereign state isn't the UN's business unless the security council finds it necessary and appropriate to intervene under the "responsibility to protect" initiative. The initiative covers genocide, war crimes…
The Short Answer
This was answered pretty well by /u/Arn_Thor in /r/Ask_Politics > Because riots in a sovereign state isn't the UN's business unless the security council finds it necessary and appropriate to intervene under the "responsibility to protect" initiative. The initiative covers genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and ethnic cleansing – none of which is going on in Ukraine. If the situation in Ukraine merits UN intervention, then so did the riots in Turkey, Egypt, Yemen – not to mention Syria. The question makes me wonder what you perceive the UN's purpose to be? [Link to the post](_URL_0_)
Analysis
Key Concepts: Riots, un's, initiative
This explanation focuses on riots, un's, initiative and spans 102 words across 5 sentences. At 44% above the average Nature explanation (71 words), this is one of the more thorough answers in this category, reflecting the complexity of the underlying question.
What This Answer Covers
The explanation opens with: “This was answered pretty well by /u/Arn_Thor in /r/Ask_Politics > Because riots in a sovereign state isn't the UN's “ It then elaborates by explaining the root cause, ultimately building toward a complete picture across 5 connected points.
How This Compares in Nature
Ranked #111 of 500 Nature questions by answer depth (top 23%). This places it in the comprehensive tier — the top quarter of most thoroughly answered questions. Questions at this depth typically involve multi-faceted topics requiring nuanced explanation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a simple explanation for why the us/eu/un/nato intervene in the ukraine, like they did in syria/libya/afghanistan/etc….?
This was answered pretty well by /u/Arn_Thor in /r/Ask_Politics > Because riots in a sovereign state isn't the UN's business unless the security council finds it necessary and appropriate to intervene under the "responsibility to protect"…
How detailed is this explanation compared to similar Nature questions?
This is one of the most thorough answer at 102 words, ranked #111 of 500 Nature questions by depth. The key concepts covered are riots, un's, initiative.
What approach does this answer take to explain the us/eu/un/nato intervene in the ukraine, like they did in?
The explanation uses root cause analysis across 102 words. It is categorized under Nature and addresses the question through 1 analytical lens.