Pochemy.net
history History

Why was a constitutional amendment required to prohibit alcohol, but no such amendment is needed for the prohibition of other drugs?

Mark Sterling
Mark Sterling
Research Editor · Mar 1, 2026 · Updated Apr 13, 2026

*Just spitballing here, but this is what I'm thinkin…* Drugs aren't banned, per say, as alcohol was during Prohibition. You never hear people charged with having "illegal" substances, only "controlled." It's a longstanding tradition in government to regulate the whole living hell out of anythin…

58
Words

1 min
Read Time

#264
of 500 in History

-19%
vs Category Avg

The Short Answer

*Just spitballing here, but this is what I'm thinkin…* Drugs aren't banned, per say, as alcohol was during Prohibition. You never hear people charged with having "illegal" substances, only "controlled." It's a longstanding tradition in government to regulate the whole living hell out of anything you don't think you can get away with straight-up outlawing. Guns, for example.

Analysis

Key Concepts: Spitballing, thinkin, drugs

This explanation focuses on spitballing, thinkin, drugs and spans 58 words across 3 sentences. The depth is typical for History questions (category average: 72 words), striking a balance between accessibility and completeness.

What This Answer Covers

The explanation opens with: “*Just spitballing here, but this is what I'm thinkin…* Drugs aren't banned, per say, as alcohol was during Prohibition” It then elaborates by presenting a contrasting perspective, ultimately building toward a complete picture across 3 connected points.

How This Compares in History

Ranked #264 of 500 History questions by answer depth (top 54%). This is in the concise tier — a focused explanation that prioritizes clarity over exhaustiveness. Many readers prefer this level of directness.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is there a simple explanation for why a constitutional amendment required to prohibit alcohol, but no such amendment is needed for the prohibition of other drugs?

*Just spitballing here, but this is what I'm thinkin…* Drugs aren't banned, per say, as alcohol was during Prohibition. You never hear people charged with having "illegal" substances, only "controlled." It's a longstanding tradition in government…

How detailed is this explanation compared to similar History questions?

This is a focused answer at 58 words, ranked #264 of 500 History questions by depth. The key concepts covered are spitballing, thinkin, drugs.

What approach does this answer take to explain a constitutional amendment required to prohibit alcohol, but?

The explanation uses concrete examples and contrasting perspectives across 58 words. It is categorized under History and addresses the question through 2 analytical lenses.