Why are men’s pant sizes in measurements and women’s pant sizes in generalized numbers?
Women's sizes basically mean nothing anymore. They were suppose to be a ratio of bust, waist, and hip and were meant to show a smaller number because it made women feel better about their body. Smaller number is just more appealing than something like inches.
The Short Answer
Women's sizes basically mean nothing anymore. They were suppose to be a ratio of bust, waist, and hip and were meant to show a smaller number because it made women feel better about their body. Smaller number is just more appealing than something like inches. They don't seem to be standard at all anymore. Women just wing it at the store, I think. I guess it kind of forces women to look around more to find the size that fits them in each brand too… probably helps sell more clothes. Men's size is supposed to be waist and inseam. Unfortunately it's not even accurate anymore. I have bought 4 pair of pants recently. All Jeans, all the same manufacturer, all the same cut, all different colors. All 34×32. Two pair are exact 34×32. Two are 32×31. There is no reason…
Analysis
Key Concepts: Anymore, women, waist
This explanation focuses on anymore, women, waist and spans 139 words across 15 sentences. At 93% above the average Biology explanation (72 words), this is one of the more thorough answers in this category, reflecting the complexity of the underlying question.
What This Answer Covers
The explanation opens with: “Women's sizes basically mean nothing anymore.” It then elaborates by explaining the root cause, ultimately building toward a complete picture across 15 connected points.
How This Compares in Biology
Ranked #45 of 500 Biology questions by answer depth (top 10%). This places it in the comprehensive tier — the top quarter of most thoroughly answered questions. Questions at this depth typically involve multi-faceted topics requiring nuanced explanation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is there a simple explanation for why men's pant sizes in measurements and women's pant sizes in generalized numbers?
Women's sizes basically mean nothing anymore. They were suppose to be a ratio of bust, waist, and hip and were meant to show a smaller number because it made women feel better about their body. Smaller number is just more appealing than something…
How detailed is this explanation compared to similar Biology questions?
This is one of the most thorough answer at 139 words, ranked #45 of 500 Biology questions by depth. The key concepts covered are anymore, women, waist.
What approach does this answer take to explain men's pant sizes in measurements and women's pant sizes in g?
The explanation uses root cause analysis across 139 words. It is categorized under Biology and addresses the question through 1 analytical lens.